• Welcome to engineeringclicks.com
  • FEA and Hand calculations anomaly

    Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by riz_sat, Aug 4, 2013.

    1. riz_sat

      riz_sat New Member

      Joined:
      Aug 2013
      Posts:
      2
      Likes Received:
      0
      Hello everyone,
      I have this problem which always bother me a lot! whenever I do FEA on any part and compare the results against the hand calculations what I notice is huge anomaly which is clearly not in the range of 0 to 15% of FEA results.
      I have even showed those calculations to my supervisors which they think are correct but I just can't understand the reason for such deviation!
      Has it happened to anyone else? What is the solution for this?
       
    2.  
    3. joninstjohn

      joninstjohn Member

      Joined:
      Aug 2012
      Posts:
      13
      Likes Received:
      0
      There could be so many reasons for this. If your supervisors agree your calcs are correct then your model must be wrong. Have you done convergence checks? Most problems (assuming loads are corectly applied) are insufficient mesh density and incorrect assumptions at boundary conditions.

      Without a specific example I can't really help.
       
    4. CPPMable

      CPPMable Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 2012
      Posts:
      100
      Likes Received:
      0
      Like joninstjohn state first I would look at your mesh and boundary conditions this is the most common mistake that new users of FEA or any computational software make when setting up a problem. You can not just input some numbers and geometry and get the right results. I have spent months and nearly a year setting up and developing code to solve certain situations. I am assuming that your problem is simple if you are solving it by hand and depending on the equations you may not be holding enough decimals sometimes gives an error not as large as you a presenting. If you want more help provide us with some more details. Since it is simple enough to solve by hand you should get exactly the same answers if both methods are done properly with a good software package.
       
    5. mechaboy

      mechaboy Active Member

      Joined:
      Aug 2013
      Posts:
      38
      Likes Received:
      0
      to achieve a true answer in a FEA software you need experience more than any knowledge.do you have enough experience to be sure about your results in software?
       
    6. kelsalla

      kelsalla New Member

      Joined:
      Aug 2013
      Posts:
      1
      Likes Received:
      0
      Make sure the boundary conditions are correct. In hand calculations of a simple beam with simple supports with a uniform load you should have a smile shape in regard to deflections. If in FEA you restrict the face of the edges you should notice that the deflection will not start at the edge but a short distance in towards the center. If the shape of the deflection is correct you should check the material properties used in the FEA to make sure that it matches the hand calculations. I normally find hand calculations will be off by about 10-30% depending on the loading and how complex the geometry is. Hope this helps.
       

    Share This Page