I appreciate your opinion Dana, however I have met other researchers who have discovered how education has been manipulated because profit is more important than morals to certain global corporations. I've messed around with enough high frequency high voltage experiments to come to the realisation that there is a large chunk of knowledge missing from our education. People I know have traced electronics back to where the history / physics books have been altered at Cambridge University. Einstein and others were used a pawn to change the course of our human advancement. I can demonstrate some of this information if any of you are interested. I also personally know a number of inventors that have been suppressed. One of them lost a whole business with 50 employees because of his work involved with obtaining energy from water. Our governments are not going to provide the solution for us as they are totally in bed with the big corporations. Haven't any of you seen Thrive yet??? Just search Thrive on youtube. It's a 2 hour factual documentary about why the world is the way it is and not thriving. Pure genius of the filmakers! Have you not seen "Who killed the electric car"? bTHsTCBxDM8 The answer to our most of our human needs is already here but heavily suppressed because it will put so many corporations out of business including the petroleum, cotton, paper, building, paint and plastics industries to name a very small few. 8rpY-8u8_Iw People just don't realise it yet! Here is a video that I believe demonstrates an important principle of how this works. gfo0OnUfd9I The comment on the video by the author says: "According the laws of conservation energy is never created, only converted. In this case we are alluding to the concept that time is a form of energy that could be exploited." Henry Ford's car ran on hemp oil, was made from a hemp composite 10x stronger than steel. MGZEMwMx2vk Come on guys, we are being DUPED by our governments for personal gain! Go back to mechanical / electrical engineers before the 1930's. Me and many others believe Nikola Tesla probably the greatest mechanical engineer we know of. Research "Wardenclyffe Tower" Best regards, Paul
Not going to argue about your conspiracy theories; I'll just point out that the machine you've been describing is a purely mechanical system, having nothing to do with high frequency or high voltage... operating (or not operating) under principles that have been well understood since Newton's time, and learned and successfully applied by engineers since them. Those principles say you can't get something for nothing. So I say again: Please describe how your machine works, and where the energy comes to keep it running. Until you can do that, or demonstrate its function with verifiable measurements, nobody will take you seriously.
Hi Dana, I have been researching pretty much full time for the last 2 1/2 years about this. The primary reason the corrupt powers that be have been suppressing the emergence of exotic free energy technologies has been because these technologies render them obsolete and empower the people. “conspiracy theory†was born to describe anything that questions official, establishment positions. Problem is, in the realm of establishment positioning, by definition, everything is conspiracy, putting the term conspiracy theory in the same league as “wet water†Ok, so lets just brush of the conspiracy facts I presented. Here is the bit I think you missed from my previous post. Here is a video that I believe demonstrates an important principle of how this works. gfo0OnUfd9I The comment on the video by the author says: "According the laws of conservation energy is never created, only converted. In this case we are alluding to the concept that time is a form of energy that could be exploited." Ok sorry about my strange poor comparison using HV / HF may not make sense. As you know high voltage is high electrical pressure. High voltage = Heavy weights. High frequency = higher torque curve = less dead spots / no dead spots The wheel is like a set of tipping scales that constantly is tipping. As long as the centre of gravity is constantly moved then the wheel is continuously turning because it is off balance. Any mechanism which optimises more weight to be one side more than the other keeps it turning. Here is the patent: https://www.dropbox.com/s/whkfnj1gl67ujtt/WO2010062207dmitriev.pdf Your right, no one on this forum will take me seriously enough until I produce a video convincing enough to make someone replicate and confirm my findings. Then it will get really interesting whilst the best of the best on here refine the design and the newbies learn a whole new lesson and we all move away from oil. Best regards, Paul
This is a capture of the inventor's website before disaster struck. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ve1avwvtmc8tc62/Gravitational engine - English Home.htm
The inventor's youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/MikhailDmitriyev?feature=watch Our work is based on real experiments, not on an incomplete formula concocted by the brains of the day under duress. Best regards, Paul
Hi folks, maniacal _engineer has very kindly drawn this in Solidworks. I know what it is supposed to do but this drawing doesn't make complete sense to me, so I am sharing for more input. Does this still require one way bearings or normal bearings? My solution for the one way bearing is something like this: Best regards, Paul
Hi all! My machinist recommended I incorporate a pinch bolt into the arm design to make assembly and bearing changes easier. This is just the first draft. The weight it will hold is 10kg. The arms are going to be machined from 25mm thick aluminium. Do you think a pinch gap of 2mm is ok? If not what do you think I should use? I thought 8mm pinch bolt would be ok. Best regards, Paul
leave it as is you are better off to just leave it as a rectangle - no need to have the outside curve follow the contour of the hole for the shaft. If you leave it as a rectangle then the flex that closes the hole is localized to the area away fron the pinch bolts and you get better leverage and less distortion in the area of the bolt, plus less machining. The only downside is a little more weight, but this thing isn't flying, so no big problem.
I used one way clutches with radial ball bearings. The cam is not shown. It won't work, but if a machine like this were capable of working, this is the breadboard I would design to investigate cam design, relative arm length, arm/ bellcrank angle etc to optimize performance. Remember - out of tune, leaky, back lash ridden, sub-optimal engines really run, pampered, expensively machined, honed, tweaked, and tuned perpetual motion machines ...don't. The term SCRAM for nuke reactors stands for "Super Critical Reactor Ax Man" because they had a guy with an ax ready to drop a neutron absorbring sheet into the reactor if it started to run away. Because nuclear is a real source of energy they got power out of even a primitive pile of graphite reactor. If you can't do something similar here, then this is not viable.
Hi folks, please forget any perpetual motion machines of the past and help me analyse my diagram using basic physics. Does anyone agree that this diagram shows clearly a large off balance at nearly all of the rotation? Therefore, if the weight differences can overcome the friction of the main shaft bearings, theoretically it should keep rotating. Would anyone agree or disagree with the proposed positions assuming the design used one way clutch bearings? I am pondering on how to illustrate the inertia and leverage energies too. Best regards, Paul
