• Welcome to engineeringclicks.com
• # module of gear

Discussion in 'The main mechanical design forum' started by sm203, Apr 10, 2010.

1. ### sm203New Member

Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
1
0
hello.. I have difficulty in choosing gears for my project. What is the different between gear module 1.0 with module 2.0 and so on.. What is the module indicating? The lower the module, what is the effect? I hope somebody can help me with this problem. Thnks..

2.
3. ### mvalentiWell-Known Member

Joined:
Nov 2009
Posts:
257
0
Gearing: The Module and Gear Cutters.

Selecting a gear cutter requires little knowledge about how the gear tooth and the pinion leaf are supposed to be designed because cutters have been standardized in order to achieve economies of scale. If a cutter could be used to generate a wide variety of different gears, then a much more limited and therefore less expensive set of cutters would be needed to perform a wide variety of tasks. You will have concluded after reading the essays about the epicycloidal and involute curves that each gear should be individually designed and each needs its own individual cutter. You would be correct if you designed the gear train to have 12 tooth pinions; the angle of rotation during impulse is small, so the design of the tooth becomes less important and using a design that is merely approximately correct becomes acceptable.

To determine the appropriate cutter for the task, you must first find the module, defined as the pitch circle diameter in millimeters divided by the number of teeth. Since it is difficult to measure the pitch diameter accurately, an easy method is to measure the distance between centers (the distance between the bushings, or the distance between the pivots if the gear and pinion were mounted in a depthing tool). The module is equal to twice the distance between centers divided by the sum of the gear and pinion teeth.

For example, if the distance between centers were 12 mm, the gear had 50 teeth, and the pinion had 10 teeth, then twice the distance (2x12) divided by the sum of teeth (50+10) would be 24/60 = 0.4 = module. The module is a measure of the space between two teeth.

Notice that both the gear and the pinion have the same module or they will not mesh properly. Though they have the same module, different cutters are used to make them. The gear and the pinion have different numbers of teeth, so the angle between each tooth will be different. It is said that the taper is different.

Each cutter will have the number of the module on it. It will also have two numbers, such as "35-54" to indicate that it may be used to cut a gear with between 35 and 54 teeth. A selection of cutters for a module would look something like this:

6 teeth
7
8
9
10-11
12-13
14-16
17-20
21-25
26-34
35-54
55-134
134- rack

If the cutter does not have a tooth number range on it, it may have a "w" for wheel (or gear). It is important to be aware that different systems have various guidelines for their uses. It is therefore vital to know what system the cutter comes from.

The cutters made under the metric system, which is what I have described here, are available in modules ranging from 0.2 to 1.0, in increments of 0.05. You must round off your calculation to the nearest module size: for example, if your calculation is 0.2375, you select a module size of 0.25.

When making a new gear to replace an antique gear, problems can arise when trying to reproduce the original design. There are differences between English, German, and American gear designs. Some have taller teeth, some smaller. Some have radial flanks. Others have flanks that are curved outwards for additional strength. Custom gearcutting can present difficulties when you have a standardized set of cutters. In this situation, there is no substitute for practical experience.

4. ### mvalentiWell-Known Member

Joined:
Nov 2009
Posts:
257
0
BTW I totally ripped that off the internets somewheres...

5. ### DhanushMember

Joined:
Aug 2011
Posts:
13
0
Hey ,

For general understanding on this subject kindly refer 'Gear Engineering by H.E.Merritt'. It is a good book available easily worldwide.Best luck.

Regards,
DN :ugeek:

6. ### SCIYERWell-Known Member

Joined:
Sep 2011
Posts:
48
0
Metric gears are expressed in "module". A module of a gear m = (pcd of gear)/ (number of teeth) and is expressed in mm.
As a general rule, the addendum of a gear is "Proportioned" to be equal to module and the dedundum is "proportioned" to be equal to 1.25 times the module. I am using the word "Proportioned", since it is not a strict rule. The general pressure angle used for gears is 20 deg. Thus the minimum number of teeth required on pinion (smaller gear) is 17 without correction.
Thus higher the module, larger the teeth. Gear design is a complex mechanism and depends on the torque transmitted. material of mating gears, speed of mating gears and many other factors. This requires a through study.
For further study, I would recommend CMTI handbook and PSG Design DATA. There are plenty of BIS standards that throw light on definitions of terms used in Gear Design which should put you on the road to learning.
Good Luck.

7. ### mymachineinfoMember

Joined:
May 2015
Posts:
15
0
herman

Choosing gear module is determined by the transmitted power. It relates by gear ability to hold the surface load and deflection caused by gear torque.

8. ### s.weinbergWell-Known MemberEngineeringClicks Expert

Joined:
Nov 2012
Posts:
348
0

The module is a scaling factor.

If you have a module 1.0 gear, a module 2.0 gear with the same parameters will look exactly the same except that everything will be twice as big. A 0.5 module gear will be exactly the same, but half as big. This only applies to the gear outline, not the thickness, or anything like that, which is not described my module.

Joined:
Sep 2017
Posts:
2