Engineering Disasters: Space Shuttle Columbia (2003)

  • Is it true that NASA kept the astronauts in the dark as they began their descent to earth? What reasons could NASA have for keeping quiet about a potential re-entry problem?
  • Official paperwork suggests that NASA refused various attempts to check the space shuttle Columbia for issues in flight. Could this have averted the disaster? Will the human race ever learn from such lessons?
  • As the space shuttle began to break up it was obvious what the endgame would be. The only mercy is that it would have been over in seconds and the astronauts would have known nothing about it.
  • Unfortunately space travel will never be risk-free but in many ways it is this leap into the unknown which keeps us all intrigued.

This short article covers the circumstances surrounding the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003 and the steps taken to correct the root cause of the accident.

Space Shuttle Columbia broke up on re-entry

On February 1, 2003, space shuttle Columbia broke up as it returned to earth’s, killing the seven astronauts on board. The investigation showed that during the launch a piece of foam insulation broke off from the body of the shuttle and damaged the left wing. This caused some of the tiles that provide thermal protection for the shuttle during re-entry to break off. When Columbia re-entered the Earth’s atmosphere the gaps left by the damaged tiles allowed hot atmospheric gases to penetrate the internal wing structure.

Unfortunately this caused the spacecraft to become unstable and it slowly began to break apart. Those watching on the ground could do nothing to help the astronauts which must have been a heart breaking situation.

Failings of the NASA management

Space shuttle ColumbiaThe NASA management failed to acknowledge the safety concerns of the engineering group or their suggestions for imaging to inspect possible damage. They also failed to respond to engineers’ requests to instruct the astronauts to do an inspection of the left wing. It is known that they made three separate requests for the Department of Defence (DOD) to provide imaging of the shuttle in orbit to more precisely determine the scale of the damage. NASA management did not honour these requests and in some cases they actually intervened to stop the DOD from assisting.

It is known that the higher powers in NASA were convinced that if there was damage, it would have been impossible to carry out any repairs. They decided that it would be best if the crew were not made aware of the potential damage and the likelihood that they would die on re-entry. Whether this was the correct call is highly debatable but the reality at the time was there was no way to repair the damage.

Safety improvements

After the accident, shuttle flights were suspended for over two years and indeed they did not resume for some 29 months. A review of the project’s risk management system concluded that a number of changes should be made. The most noteworthy of these changes was a mandatory requirement for an inspection to be performed while the craft was in orbit. This would ensure a thorough evaluation of the re-entry systems and raise any issues which could compromise the landing.

Future regulations for space travel also ensured that there was a designated rescue mission prepared and ready to go in case repairs were not possible. If only these regulations had been in place prior to February 1, 2003 then perhaps this disaster could have been averted?

About: William Tyrell

Mr. Tyrrell has over 40 years of project management, design and engineering experience in industries as diverse as ports, bulk handling facilities, offshore production and drilling, petrochemical and refineries, bauxite and nickel mining, mineral concentrators, pressure vessel fabrication, wood products, pulp and paper, microelectronics, and food processing.

Leave a Reply

CLOSE
CLOSE
Skip to toolbar